The days go by NASA but still do not hear news about the results of the mission and LaCross is all too easy to predict that when these come we do not really help explain what "not" happened on impact.
We have personally followed live on the site of NASA, the moment of "alleged" impact of the bomb kinetics of two tons on the surface of our satellite. According to the models and animations would have to first see the glow of the explosion and thus the plume of dust rising up to 6 kilometers. To us it seemed strange that NASA had already succeeded in making a prediction as accurate a .. plume! So much so that there have been even close.
Many believe that something is not right. When you direct the engineers at JPL are seen celebrating and shaking hands, but everything seemed a little 'artifacts especially when they had not seen anything. And we certainly can not imagine having just celebrated the fact of being able to center it ... the Moon.
As often happens, NASA has also released an image that, in their view, would have to confirm and illustrate the success of the mission. The photo is one that follows, I leave to you to decide what to see or not see.
It 'was then put online a slideshow (http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LCROSS/multimedia/index.html) that seems packed with art to distract from the fact that it says nothing.
But let's get down to brass tacks. What could have happened, to try to understand we have to take a step back. According to Richard Hoagland to the Moon, Mars, artificial structures exist in the presence of evidence of past civilizations evolved. The tower and dome are only two examples among the many anomalies that fall within this context.
The water was recently discovered on the lunar surface could, according to Hoagland, be spilling over from its ancient and huge tanks used for water conservation.
As bizarre it may seem this theory we must keep in mind two things. The first is that there is no reasonable explanation why the water should be spread over the entire surface of the Moon. It may be hidden in an ice crater and some do not, as has been said, in great abundance. Given the lack of atmosphere not to sublimate (or evaporate) water on the satellite should remain frozen in bassisime suitable temperature, the order of 40 ° Kelvin temperature is rarely reached. In areas not affected by the sun it descends to about 70 degrees Kelvin, or else you get up to 100 ° C. The second element to be reckoned with in considering the hypothesis of Hoagland, are his scientific background and contacts, which have often provided information on first degree.
Putting aside for a moment the scientific rigor, if you think about it, what could have prevented the famous and non-plume of dust to rise? A moist soil.
Returning to Hoagland, the real purpose of the bomb had little to do with the search for water, which NASA already knew to be there, but rather was assumed to blow up the man-made structure in view of keeping the secret.
Whatever the truth is a fact that NASA has wisely refrained from returning to the Moon, at least with official missions. The economic justification does not hold up, considering that even George W. Bush wanted that we will be back or that the Congress is preparing to refinance despite this, NASA has announced plans to end the Shuttle program and not being able to go to Mars. There is talk of milardi 35 dollars for doing nothing ... but the moon does not care.
Scridb filter
Related posts:
Brought to you related posts by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin .
