There is a conspiracy behind the spread of the swine flu virus and behind the distribution of the vaccine to prevent it? Maybe so, but maybe not as we understood so far.
I must immediately clarify that they are not informed about the updated numbers about the incidence of swine flu and its mortality rate, so this short article is not intended as a statistical analysis of the matter and technique. Consider it a sort of editorial, an opinion based more on experience than on numbers.
This reflection has been developed after listening to the opinion of Linda Multon Howe, in his speech to the regular radio program Coast to Coast, with respect to progression of the spread of the virus and its danger. It was very interressato to listen to his opinion because he is a researcher whom I respect for his work in the field of UFOs, and abductions of animals mutiliaziono always punctual and very approfindito. Like a few others you can almost always go back to the sources and witnesses providing information to the always reliable. I was very surprised to hear so that his opinion is totally aligned with the government institutions and medicine. This "endorsment" comes from the observation of the numbers and what the most important and informed virologists, microbiologists and so say in the matter. Basically it is called very concerned about the virus itself but also and especially for the incomprehensible, he said, very common conspiracy attitude especially in the network.
This position gave me a doubt, it is possible that all of us have been deceived to the point that this strong opposition to vaccination was planned and calculated? Before explaining this point I will return to the opinion of Howe and explain why I think you will still have to prove wrong so trusting. One of the reasons why you tend to trust stems from his personal knowledge with many researchers in the health system, people she trusts also from the point of view "human".
What are the protagonists of the events related to the "Swine Flu"? There are four governments, media, pharmaceutical companies and of course the health care system. The sick can not be considered characters because everything that happens is beyond their control. First things first.
Governments: Can we trust what they say governments (forgive if I generalize the concept but it is what matters)? I would say no easily. There are countless cases in which it was shown that people's health was not at the top priority of the rulers. Carry only two examples, but there would be many others. In 1966 the U.S. Army released into the ventilation system in the metropolitan New York City on Bacillus subtilis to test its dissemination. Since 1981, when thanks to the support of Donald Rumsfeld, former secretary of defense, 'aspartame was approved, despite evidence to the contrary of the FDA, it has not been banned despite being the most widely demonstrated to be extraordinarily dangerous for the human body . It is reasonable to say that so it is possible not to trust what governments say the H1N1 virus.
The media: I would say about this is even unnecessary to bring any example. Conflicts of interest between honest reporting and properties are so obvious that it is not necessary to be more specific. TV and newspapers lie in the interests of publishers. Among the peculiar interests of the great families of the world economy include the owner of Rockefeller eugenics distinctly.
Pharmaceutical companies: in this case is like shooting at the red cross ... the string of zeros that follow one another in the figures gained from the sale of vaccines is so exaggerated that it is impossible to believe that their interests would be to provide a cure rather than to produce income. Just compare the price of generic drugs and does not contain the same active ingredient. You can get up to 500000% of inflation ...
(Eg, Zithromax ® Final price (in $) for 100 caps: 1482.19 - Cost ($) 100 caps of Generic: 18.78 ->% Increase: 7792) (source: http://www.disinformazione .com / costofarmaci.htm)
An individual or a company in this way Take advantage of its dominant position I do not think we should trust.
The health care system: it is important to clarify that I am absolutely convinced that the vast majority of operators are perfectly in good faith in the care of this problem and in recommending vaccines. But I also believe that despite their competitiveness simply wrong. I'm not sure I say it, but if we take as a comparison such as HIV and AIDS, a subject on which all well-known specialists should converge, we find that it is not so. I mention only two of the many opinions that you can easily find:
Dr. Kary Mullis, Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry:
"If there was proof that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents that, individually or collectively, the audition, at least with high probability. There is no such document "(Sunday Times (London) November 28, 1993)
Dr. Heinz Ludwig Sänger, Emeritus Professor of Molecular Biology and Virology, Max-Planck-Institutes for Biochemy, Munich. Robert Koch Prize in 1978:
"To date there is no convincing scientific evidence of the existence of HIV. Nor has never been such a retrovirus isolated and purified by the methods of classical virology "(Letter to the Süddeutsche Zeitung, 2000)
So the fact that many doctors trained and honest support the dangers of the virus is not enough for me, frankly.
This is the first face of the conspiracy, the one that immediately leaps to the eyes of those who do not nourish their daily ration of information through open study and TG4. Perhaps, however, and here we enter a more speculative area, another one exists. The same Howe, criticizing the "conspiracy" has suggested that there was a conspiracy, conspiracy itself becoming, in the circulation of false information and tendensiose ... especially on the internet.
This is something not to be underestimated. Nowadays, anyone who pulls the strings of world events is well aware of the impact on the public network. So this anti-proliferation of witness vaccine, resulting in even suspected delays in vaccine production, may have been intentionally introduced. For what reason?
For the same reason that they introduced, as some argue, the virus in circulation. For the same reason that according to others, the vaccine is more dangerous than the virus itself. The depopulation. On one side thinks the other damaged the vaccine virus, perhaps really dangerous, including those who refused the vaccine.
So the situation may be even worse than feared, but always keeping present, which is still of influence. The remedy must be sought not so much in the goodness of the vaccines but especially in our lifestyle. Learning to wash hands, eat healthy and exercise. Being short, responsible for our health.
Related posts:
Brought to you related posts by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin .
